Thermwood / eCabinet Systems

Gentlemen,

Would one or both of you please send me a Control Nesting export that reproduces this print skew (please make sure you are using 5.81 CN).

Gentlemen,

As Forrest just mentioned, the latest Control Nesting (5.80+) will now attempt to pocket dados when an acceptable size range dado tool is not found. It's a great new feature, so do not do extra work making part editor dados just to achieve this. Let us know if you run into any issues.

Mark,

You are doing everything correctly. It does appears to be an issue with metric. I have it listed and we will resolved it as soon as possible. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

Gentlemen,

I have reproduced this issue and have it listed. We will get it resolved as soon as possible.

Gentlemen,

Thanks for reporting the issue. I have it listed and we will get it resolved as soon as we can.

Scott Marshburn wrote:I am using an standard framed upper.

Ahhh, that's where I was out of sync with you. Now that I am loading the Std Upper Framed, I am see your issue. I will get it listed and resolved. For now, if you regen the cabinet once more, it will correct itself. Thanks for the report.

Scott,

Hmmm, I get 29 1/2" for the stile length and 34 1/2" for the ends. With a 5" toe height, this still seems to all be correct for me. You are using the Std Base Framed, correct?

Scott, I am not sure if I fully understand the issue. It seems to be doing what it is suppose to do. My initial bottom f(x) inset gets set to 1.25" with the 3/4 Generic default material. Then when I change it to 1/2 Generic Dbx , the f(x) inset gets set to 1.5". This appears to be correct....

Gentlemen, I see the issues described here and displayed in Scott's video. The first and main issue is that it still sees 3 entities after creating the 3" radius fillet between the two 3" lines (note that in the lower right it still says Entities= 3 ). When you fillet an entity to nothing,...

Scott Marshburn wrote:Ok. So if I understand correctly I should delete the existing shelf then apply the formula and add a new shelf? Haven’t tried this yet but just checking.

Yes, that should work for you. Works in my tests anyway. Let me know if it does not work for you.

Scott, Wanted to let you know of a work around in case you didn't discover it. If you add the adjustable shelf or partition with an f(x) formula already set, it will then work fine. Just try to avoid highlighting them to add an initial f(x) formula inset. Hope this gets you around the issue until we...

Scott.

Thanks for the post and concise steps. It appears this is happening for adjustable shelves and partitions. I will get it documented and resolved. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Had a phone conversation with Josh this morning and had him delete his history.mdb file from the C:\Rolling Nest directory and delete his files in the C:\Rolling Nest\SavedHistory folder. After that, all seems to be working correctly.

Jeremy Schiffer wrote:Hi Scott, here's the export and offending TWD file (change the file extensions, of course). Thanks!

Jeremy,

Thanks for the files. We have reproduced it and will have it resolved for the next version. Sorry for the delayed response.

Josh,

I will start looking into it on Monday and let you know if we need more info from you.