Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Moderators: Jason Susnjara, Larry Epplin, Clint Buechlein, Scott G Vaal, Jason Susnjara, Larry Epplin, Clint Buechlein, Scott G Vaal

Post Reply
User avatar
Scott Marshburn
Guru Member
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat, Mar 05 2011, 7:29AM
Company Name: Heritage WoodWorks
Country: UNITED STATES
Location: Jacksonville Nc
Contact:

Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott Marshburn »

1) In cabinet editor load a std base Framed cabinet from the standard library
2) In Construction Settings under add shelf settings in the f(x) editor for the front inset enter the following formula (Cabinet depth – Back thickness – Left stile thickness)/2
3) Click ok to return to main. Then take it into the shelf editor, Select the shelf right click and select construction settings then click ok.
4) Return to main notice that the shelf is exactly ½ the inside depth of the cabinet.
5) Change the cabinet depth to 21 inches note that the shelf is now 8 ¼ and the distance from the front of the shelf to the back of the face frame is 11 ¼ even though the front inset in construction settings is saying 9 ¾.

Everything seems to work fine with a frameless cabinet.
User avatar
Scott Marshburn
Guru Member
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat, Mar 05 2011, 7:29AM
Company Name: Heritage WoodWorks
Country: UNITED STATES
Location: Jacksonville Nc
Contact:

Re: Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott Marshburn »

Has anyone else had this issue? Or am I doing something wrong?
User avatar
Scott G Vaal
Thermwood Team
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue, May 17 2005, 12:44PM
Company Name: Thermwood Corporation
Location: Thermwood Corp: Dale, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott G Vaal »

Scott.

Thanks for the post and concise steps. It appears this is happening for adjustable shelves and partitions. I will get it documented and resolved. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards,

Scott Vaal
-Thermwood/eCabinet Systems-
Dell Precision / Xeon E3-1240 / 8GB RAM /NVIDIA Quadro K2000
User avatar
Scott Marshburn
Guru Member
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat, Mar 05 2011, 7:29AM
Company Name: Heritage WoodWorks
Country: UNITED STATES
Location: Jacksonville Nc
Contact:

Re: Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott Marshburn »

Thanks Scott.
User avatar
Scott G Vaal
Thermwood Team
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue, May 17 2005, 12:44PM
Company Name: Thermwood Corporation
Location: Thermwood Corp: Dale, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott G Vaal »

Scott,

Wanted to let you know of a work around in case you didn't discover it. If you add the adjustable shelf or partition with an f(x) formula already set, it will then work fine. Just try to avoid highlighting them to add an initial f(x) formula inset. Hope this gets you around the issue until we get it resolved.
Regards,

Scott Vaal
-Thermwood/eCabinet Systems-
Dell Precision / Xeon E3-1240 / 8GB RAM /NVIDIA Quadro K2000
User avatar
Scott Marshburn
Guru Member
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat, Mar 05 2011, 7:29AM
Company Name: Heritage WoodWorks
Country: UNITED STATES
Location: Jacksonville Nc
Contact:

Re: Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott Marshburn »

Ok. So if I understand correctly I should delete the existing shelf then apply the formula and add a new shelf? Haven’t tried this yet but just checking.
User avatar
Scott G Vaal
Thermwood Team
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue, May 17 2005, 12:44PM
Company Name: Thermwood Corporation
Location: Thermwood Corp: Dale, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Issue with face frame cabinet and f(x) for shelves

Post by Scott G Vaal »

Scott Marshburn wrote:Ok. So if I understand correctly I should delete the existing shelf then apply the formula and add a new shelf? Haven’t tried this yet but just checking.
Yes, that should work for you. Works in my tests anyway. Let me know if it does not work for you.
Regards,

Scott Vaal
-Thermwood/eCabinet Systems-
Dell Precision / Xeon E3-1240 / 8GB RAM /NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Post Reply